Make Anythink From Here

BANDUNG, Residents of Bandung City View 2 Feel Deprived of Their Rights Because of the Administrative Court Decision

  • Share

DISCLOSURE An heir filed a lawsuit with the Bandung Administrative Court regarding the land on which the Bandung City View 2 housing complex was built on Jalan Pasir Impun, Pasir Impun Village, Mandalajati District, Bandung City.

Based on the lawsuit, the Bandung Administrative Court granted the claim of the heirs, but the developer of Bandung City View 2 is now filing an appeal against the decision.

Developers and residents of Bandung City View 2 feel deprived of their rights and comfort because of the Administrative Court Decision.

Also Read: Lord Adi MasterChef Returns Not to be a Finalist for MasterChef Season 8, dr Tirta: You have captured the hearts of viewers

Also Read: Need To Know Yes, This Is The Difference Between Khodam and Qorin

Also Read: Rat Pest Control Is Done, Save West Java Rice Production and Harvest

From that, there was unrest among the residents of Bandung City View 2 considering that they all bought the house with clear certificates and rights.

The lawsuit was filed by Deny Septiana’s heirs against the Bandung BPN Office as the defendant and PT Global Kurnia Grahatama as the intervention defendant I.

PT Global Kurnia Grahatama is the developer of the Bandung City View 2 housing estate which is located on Jalan Pasir Impun, Pasir Impun Village, Mandalajati District, Bandung City.

The lawsuit was filed on an area of ​​42,780 square meters or more than 4 hectares.

Meanwhile, the total land owned by PT Global Kurnia Grahatama which is used as the Bandung City View 2 Complex is 80,888 square meters or 8 hectares.

Also Read: Leaked FTV Soundtrack Preman Retires Human Freedom. This is the title and lyrics of the song

Read also: Jesselyn and Nadya to the Grand Final of MasterChef Indonesia Season 8, as if it had been read from the start

The plaintiff has filed the lawsuit to the Bandung Administrative Court since January 7, 2021.

Even then, the Bandung Administrative Court judge decided in favor of the plaintiff.

“The trial in the main case granted the plaintiff’s claim in its entirety. Declared the cancellation of the certificate of building rights covering an area of ​​80,888 square meters registered in the name of PT Global Kurnia Grahatama for a limited area of ​​42,780 square meters,” said the judge in a copy of the verdict received by journalists on Monday, August 23, 2021.

The matter at PTUN was led by the Chief Judge Liza Valianty with members Lusinda Panjaitan and Kemas Mendi Zatmiko. The decision was read on July 22, 2021.

Also Read: Jackie Chan and Joe Taslim Join the Shopee 9.9 Super Shopping Day Promo!

Also read: Want a Healthy Heart, Try Keeping a Cat at Home

“We have made an appeal,” said Norman Nurdjaman as Director of PT Global Kurnia Grahatama when asked for a response regarding the results of the lawsuit.

Norman explained that there were several odd things in the decision.

One of them, he said, was that the panel of judges ignored the formal administrative requirements in making decisions.

“There are several things that we will say about the formal requirements that are set aside, the boundaries are also ignored and the three lawsuits are about SHM, how come the name of the Netherlands appears, even though it has been proven at the BPN in 1961 such administrative processes and others,” he said.

Norman explained that in Bandung City View 2 alone there are 300 housing units. While the object of land being sued is 4 hectares with a total of 200 units.

Read also: Jesselyn Promises that if he wins, the MasterChef Indonesia Cup Session 8 is dedicated to this person

Read also: Jesselyn who just graduated from college vs. Nadya the Bread Trader, Competing in the Grand Final of MasterChef Indonesia S8

Norman said his party was still trying to fight through an appeal against the verdict.

“Our position is the same as that of consumers as good buyers because I myself cannot sue the fourth owner, and so on. So when asked what guarantees we have to the residents, we are confused because we are innocent,” he said.

He added that the lawsuit was suddenly accepted by the developer earlier this year.

In fact, he said, the land purchased by the developer for the Bandung City View 2 housing estate was in accordance with the regulations.

While the plaintiff only has evidence of Eigendom Verponding which was published in 1935.

Also Read: Rijanti Rahaju Maulani, Fan of Orchid and Aglaonema Ornamental Plants

Also Read: Judge Postpones the Sentencing Session for the Corruption Case of the Mayor of Cimahi Ajay M Priatna to Tuesday, August 24, 2021

According to Norman, the land has changed ownership several times.

His party also bought the land after changing ownership to the fourth.

“I as a citizen ask for protection, I am the fifth buyer, the sixth to 200th buyers are residents here. What do I feel was my fault as a developer? Because when we purchased the land we already checked, sent a letter to BPN asking for a history of the land. everything is clear, we take all taxes and permits,” he said.

“We are currently fighting for justice, so that there is legal certainty in our country. Imagine this is the legal standing of the plaintiff, Eigendom Verpoonding in 1935, 10 years before we became independent. We as citizens also question legal certainty in our country,” he added. ***

  • Share

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *